Guy de Faye

Home
Questions
Policies
About
Contact
 


Home
Policies
About Guy
Contact

States Information
Travel & Transport Plan
Rural Economy Strategy
 
Sitting Senators
Sitting Deputies
 
States Website
 
   
     

St Helier Priorities

Rates

Few can argue that the current parish rating system is operating satisfactorily. However, that is not an argument for scrapping it or dramatically dismantling the basic structure. In order to operate effectively, the parish requires an income source, which the rates have traditionally provided - and this should continue. The problem facing St Helier is that a substantial proportion of the rest of the Island is using the facilities of Jersey's capital without paying for them. One of the worst offenders is the States of Jersey, which maintains a large number of administrative buildings in St Helier, which pay no rates to the parish at all. This is clearly unfair, as it simply deprives St Helier of revenue to which the parish would be entitled if the office buildings were owned by any other body. The States of Jersey must review its position as a matter of urgency, in order to end this unfair loading on parish services.

Top

Welfare

Welfare payments place an undue burden on parish finances and consequently on the amounts of money that need to be levied via the rates. Few people want to be welfare claimants, but inevitably, redundancies or personal problems can lead to individuals and families being overwhelmed by their problems and in need of assistance. Some local authority should provide a "safety net", to ensure that basic human needs are met - and the parish administration is an appropriate base for this type of help, rather than a more bureaucratic and impersonal central department, serving the entire Island. Some parishes currently retain their own Welfare Officers, who are generally acknowledged as being able to provide personalised and tailored services on an individual case basis. An approach that has a higher chance of achieving positive results, from tackling deviant behaviour to sourcing new employment.

Given the clear advantages to administering welfare via the parish, it is also apparent that the costs of welfare should be shouldered by the entire Island community rather than those parishes which are already struggling with higher population densities. Anyone can suffer misfortune in each of twelve parishes, but just because you happen to live in one of them, that is not a sufficient reason for that parish to pay all the ensuing welfare costs.

The unfair welfare charge is not unique to St Helier and the States of Jersey should accept responsibility for regularising the existing disproportionate situation as a matter of priority. This is one area where Jersey can have the best of both worlds. The local knowledge and personal approach offered by the parishes can continue, with the bill being borne by the community as a whole out of States revenues. As a guarantee of fairness, the Connetables should meet regularly with the appropriate States Department to agree payments and procedures that would apply in an equitable way to welfare claimants across the Island.

Top

Youth

It is easy to suggest that all parents should know exactly where their children are and what they are doing at any given time, but it just doesn't happen in real life. Particularly when some adolescents take a pride in ensuring that their parents have no idea of what they are really up to and, inevitably, unsupervised children will tend to get into trouble of one sort or another.

A wide variety of solutions are available, ranging from more youth clubs and "drop in" centres to reclaiming streets from traffic and parked cars to create more leisure spaces.

One of the most obvious areas to explore, to encourage young people to pursue educational or recreational pursuits during their leisure time, is to extend school opening hours. All the familiar facilities are readily available, with libraries open for extra study or reading for pleasure, computer centres available for a vast array of pursuits or simply classrooms left open for completing homework. Supervision could be undertaken by teachers, who prefer to work later hours than the norm, approved parent volunteers or a sub-category of paid supervisory staff, which might comprise of former teachers seeking part-time work or other part-timers with appropriate social work qualifications. It seems to be a sheer waste of resources to leave so many of our school buildings unused during the late afternoons and evenings, as well as at the weekends.

Young people themselves appear to demand facilities that could be readily satisfied by commercial enterprises, such as soft drinks bars and cinema clubs. Even a call for cheaper bus fares indicates that a lower price could stimulate a surge in demand.

As for the delinquent element, although community policing is one response, a simple swap from the patrol car to mountain bikes might well provide better street mobility and a more acceptable image for youngsters to relate to.

Top

Bus Shelters

The design of bus shelters has changed substantially over the last decade. Improved materials have allowed architects to guarantee a higher level of structural resistance to vandalism and new technology has dramatically transformed their functionality. Shelters at numerous city bus stops around the world now feature electronic display boards showing the routes that are running, together with the current waiting time to the next bus. The displays can also communicate live information in the event of accidents, breakdowns or other hold ups as well as advance warnings of route or timetable changes.

Local authorities also equip shelters with the sort of internet terminals that are often seen installed in public locations like airports. These allow access to detailed information, not only on transport links, but also to government websites etc. Fulfilling both an information and entertainment function, they contribute to reducing the potential for vandalistic behaviour. In addition, they contribute to the revenue earning capacity of a bus shelter, which retains the potential to become a net earner over time, given the possible application of both traditional and electronic advertising on the site.

In the light of the clear benefits of public transport options, in terms of reducing traffic congestion and pollution, the installation of bus shelters must be a priority for St Helier. Keeping the public waiting for buses in the howling wind and driving rain is not going to encourage people to give up their cars or persuade parents to let their children travel on buses.

Top

Traffic Congestion

St Helier must be the only town in the world to complement a harbour constructed on dry land with a ring road built like a maze. The St Helier Town Centre Traffic Plan, currently under consideration, may have some impact, but the Island requires more imaginative solutions to the growing traffic problem, which relates directly to increasing levels of car ownership. The morning rush hour is the peak congestion period, but little serious effort has been made to relieve the situation by encouraging flexi-time in St Helier offices. The recent attempt to adjust school bus services was a fiasco that, unfortunately, badly undermined a well intentioned idea.

Improved public transport is the only serious alternative to car use, but Jersey continues to rely on outmoded transport models in the form of fixed bus routes and prohibitively expensive taxis. There has been no serious attempt to provide integrated transport solutions, which implies being able to use several modes of travel to get from A to B.

The bus service suffers from a series of problems, the most obvious being the lack of bus lanes. This leaves the buses queuing in the same traffic jams as all the cars. One possible solution is to create time limited bus lanes on major feeder routes into St Helier during periods of maximum congestion. As an example, the inner, inbound lane of Victoria Avenue could be restricted to buses only between 0730 and 0900 hrs in the morning, creating a clear advantage for bus travellers.

The bus routes also suffer from linkage to a central hub in St Helier at the Weighbridge. There are no cross routes to join up the outer limits of the existing structure, as well as no express routes. One obvious express route must surely run between St Helier and the Airport, which would then allow the Airport to form a satellite transport hub, operating more localised bus routes around St Brelade, St Peter and St Ouen. There are clearly a number of other express routing destinations, but the concept can be extended to a micro-route level by using a mix of vehicles. By introducing a limited number of stops onto an express route, a series of satellite hubs can be created. Thus to follow the Airport example, standard buses could stop at Goose Green, St Aubin and Quenevais en route to the Airport, allowing passengers to transfer to smaller "people carrier" vehicles that could follow routes round large housing estates or even offer a "to the door" service. This type of operation could be easily applied throughout St Helier as a logical development of the popular Hoppa bus scheme.

Taxis pose a more difficult problem, but have the essential advantage of providing a "door to door" service. The only way to reduce the cost of fares is to introduce subsidies in one form or another. The other alternative is to change the basic nature of the service from individual hire from pick up to destination to multiple hire. This would reduce fares by allowing taxi drivers to pick up more than one fare at a time, probably by using a larger than normal vehicle, and then staging a series of drop offs along a more circuitous route. This technique is already practiced by large numbers of people using standard taxis, by negotiating routings whilst waiting in line for the next ride, but it could easily be extended and regularised to provide the compromise transport solution between taxis and buses.

Top

 

     
     
     

 

Telephone:

07797 722 260

Copyright © 2005 guydefaye.com